Intelligence - English version

The intelligence Court a be is based on the statement of the intelligence of each be the surrounding and respect of two rules.

The rule here, can be broken, but then in this case, the intelligence loses his qualifier of suprêmatie.

First rule, the intelligence of another be is lower, be the noting not exploit this difference.

In other words, it does not consider this difference as a power of domination and exploitation but adapate temporarily his reasoning to the level required for a perfect communication.

It indicates the choice of developments of reasoning possible and not only his own.

The second rule, the intelligence of another be is superior, noting the be the only seeks to reduce to itself the intelligence (whose noyeau is the reasoning) of the other at his level.

In effect, if the first rule is applied, this will naturally.

The intelligent being constantly seeks to refine its reasoning, and in the case of the second rule, it will naturally seek "update" his reasoning.

You may be paying attention to the fact that the noyeau of the intelligence is the reasoning.

Here is an example illustrated may represent a reasoning.

It offers you a cocktail. Several choices available to you:

1 - You accept without conditions

2 - You accept and ask what are the ingredients

3 - You accept and analyze what are the ingredients

4 - You accept and follow the third choice of the second

5 - You agree and follow the second choice of the third

6 - You ask the reason for this offer - may follow in this choice all the other

7- You refuse

In function of these choices you can:

- Drink with 1

- Drink with 2 by sorting the ingredients, not drinking as well as those who you acceptable among the official list

- Drink with 3 by sorting the ingredients, not drinking as well as those who you acceptable among the unofficial list

- Drink with 4 by sorting the ingredients, following the analysis of the report found between the ingredients declared and those numbers ~ - - -
- Drink with 5: identical to the solution used in terms of choice four

- Drink with 6-1,2,3,4 ( =5 ),7

- Do not drink

• 
  

This was an example of reasoning, depicted.

Any reasoning is based on supply of choice and supply of response (from the Question)

In any offer of choice, the alternative of choice himself is present

With the idea that a reasoning can ammener to solve everything, we can say that everything is possible

One may also prefer the words to describe this idea : Nothing is impossible